Speaker Mike Johnson Sparks Chants of ‘Jesus!’ at Rally with Faith-Filled Message to Supporters
May 18, 2026
At the recent "Rededicate 250" prayer gathering on the National Mall, House Speaker Mike Johnson stirred the crowd with an impassioned message about faith, intertwining his political narrative with references to the Creator and America’s foundational values. The event, held ahead of the nation’s 250th anniversary, demonstrated Johnson’s continued alignment with religious themes to resonate with his conservative and evangelical base.
Standing before a crowd of thousands, Johnson addressed current efforts to rewrite American history. He described how "sinister ideologies" demand that citizens view the nation’s history, its founding heroes, and its moral identity entirely through "the lens of our sins." This cultural push from the political left, Johnson suggested, shows a lack of respect for the country's heritage and a reluctance to acknowledge America’s virtues.
“We reject that,” Johnson said, his voice rising as he looked out at the crowd. “We rebuke it.”
Johnson’s words, along with his assertion that human rights come from the "Creator and Heavenly Father" rather than the government, ignited a powerful reaction from his supporters. Many began chanting “Jesus! Jesus!” The crowd’s response underscored the deep religious undertone of the event, as attendees cheered Johnson’s direct appeal to Christian principles and patriotism.
Defender of Heritage and Faith
Johnson seized the moment to position himself as a defender of America’s core freedoms and heritage, a theme he has consistently highlighted in his role as Speaker of the House. “Our rights do not derive from the government,” he declared, drawing applause from the audience. “They come from the Creator.”
Throughout the event, Johnson emphasized the importance of faith in America, framing himself as a leader who would protect the nation's history against what he described as encroachments from historical revisionism. He asserted that the foundation of American freedom is rooted in spiritual belief, something that cannot be erased.
A Call to Action for Conservatives
Johnson’s message wasn’t just about defending history; it was also about mobilizing faith. He called on his supporters to speak up and "rededicate" themselves to the nation's ideals ahead of its 250th birthday. As America prepares for this historic milestone, Johnson encouraged believers and conservatives to stand firm, suggesting that their steadfastness would protect the very soul of the country.
At the National Mall, he urged attendees to stand up for their beliefs and refuse to yield to cultural pressure. His message was clear: defending traditional values requires active participation from people of faith.
The Strategy Behind Johnson’s Faith Appeal
Johnson’s remarks underscore his strategy to connect deeply with conservative voters by blending religious rhetoric with a message of protecting political heritage. By drawing on themes of the Creator, freedom, and cultural resistance, Johnson is attempting to galvanize his base while painting himself as a defender of traditional values in an era he describes as hostile to American history.
Political analysts have noted that his calls for a spiritual and historical awakening have become a hallmark of Johnson’s leadership style, resonating with right-wing voters who see him as an advocate for their beliefs. His speeches consistently emphasize American exceptionalism and traditional morals, which have helped him solidify his standing among conservative Christians.
A Resounding Message
As the event concluded, Johnson’s message about defending history and honoring the Creator left a powerful mark.
For many in attendance, the Speaker’s remarks resonated deeply, offering a sense of solidarity and purpose. The “Jesus! Jesus!” chants that echoed across the National Mall served as a testament to the strong connection between Mike Johnson’s political narrative and the faith-driven support of his conservative base.
Clarence Thomas Blasts Supreme Court For Refusing Florida Case
Florida argued the two states were undermining public safety by allowing individuals without legal immigration status — and, in some cases, insufficient English-language proficiency — to obtain commercial trucking licenses despite federal standards intended to govern interstate transportation safety.
The dispute gained national attention after a deadly 2025 crash on the Florida Turnpike involving an undocumented truck driver reportedly licensed through California or Washington.
According to the lawsuit, the driver allegedly made an illegal U-turn and was unable to properly interpret roadway signage, resulting in a collision that killed three people.
Joined by Justice Samuel Alito, Thomas argued the high court had a constitutional obligation to hear the interstate dispute because Florida had no other legal forum available to challenge another state’s policies.
The court’s majority denied Florida’s request without explanation.
The case underscores the growing national clash over immigration enforcement, state licensing authority, and whether states with looser immigration policies are creating broader public safety consequences for the rest of the country.
Thomas ripped the majority for refusing to hear the lawsuit since disputes between states can only be brought before the Supreme Court.
“If this Court does not exercise jurisdiction over a controversy between two States, then the complaining State has no judicial forum in which to seek relief,” Thomas wrote.
Thomas argued that Florida’s allegations against California and Washington raised serious public safety concerns, warning that failures to properly follow federal commercial driver licensing (CDL) laws can create dangerous conditions on American roadways.
Thomas pointed to the fatal Florida highway crash involving truck driver Harjinder Singh, who he said “could not read the road signs,” and argued Florida deserved a chance to pursue its claims.
Two blue states – California and Washington – issued Singh a CDL.
“An illegal alien who cannot read English road signs cannot drive an 80,000-pound tractor-trailer,” Thomas wrote.
“Federal law and regulations prohibit States from providing commercial driver’s licenses to applicants unless they pass a driver’s test, sufficiently understand the English language, and show appropriate immigration status,” he added.
Thomas argued that while the Supreme Court of the United States may have broad discretion when deciding whether to hear ordinary appeals, disputes between states occupy a different category because the Constitution grants the high court exclusive jurisdiction over those cases.
“We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given,” Thomas wrote.
He also accused the court of failing to follow the Constitution by refusing to hear disputes between states.
“This Court has adopted a discretionary approach to its exclusive original jurisdiction based on policy judgments that are in conflict with the policy choices that Congress made in the statutory text,” Thomas wrote.
Thomas argued that if Florida, California, and Washington were separate sovereign nations rather than American states, a dispute involving one government allegedly allowing unsafe drivers into another jurisdiction could trigger major diplomatic conflict.
Thomas suggested that in an international context, such disputes would likely be addressed through international courts, treaties, or direct government action.
“By entering the Union, States agree to instead have such disputes resolved by this Court,” he wrote.
The issuance of commercial driver’s licenses to non-citizens came under increased scrutiny from the Department of Transportation last summer following a series of deadly crashes involving undocumented immigrant truck drivers.
Last September, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced stricter federal requirements for non-citizens seeking commercial driver’s licenses, part of a broader push by the Trump administration to tighten transportation and immigration enforcement standards, Fox News reported.
Duffy also warned that California could risk losing federal transportation funding if the state continued allowing commercial licenses to remain active for individuals deemed ineligible under revised federal guidelines.
Kamala Harris Hints At 2028 Presidential Run
Former Vice President Kamala Harris left open the possibility Monday of another White House bid when asked whether she plans to run again. Harris, 61, announced last July that she would not seek the governorship of California, a decision that left open the possibility of a 2028 presidential campaign. Before that announcement, Harris was widely seen as weighing three options: a 2026 run for California governor, another presidential bid in 2028, or stepping away from elected office after her 2024 loss to President Donald Trump.
“Everybody here wants to know the answer. Will you run again?” podcast host and author Sharon McMahon asked the failed 2024 Democratic nominee. Harris and California Gov. Gavin Newsom currently lead a hypothetical Democratic primary field, according to the RealClearPolitics polling average. Harris receives 28.3 percent support in the average, while the term limited governor draws 20.7 percent backing.
McMahon said she was not surprised by Harris‘ answer, telling her that after reading her campaign memoir, “107 Days,” she believed Harris wanted another chance at the White House. “I closed the book and I’m like, oh, she wants to. She’s just thinking about it,” McMahon said. Harris pushed back on that interpretation. “No, the book is about a specific period in time,” she said. “There was no agenda beyond what we’ve discussed already, which is just sharing with people, you know, the reality of the experience, and hopefully allowing people to see something of themselves in it, in a way that you know that Girl Scout troop, when it comes time for them to read it, might see themselves in and know what they can do and that they could do it,” Harris said.
Kamala Harris on running in 2028: "I haven't decided. I might."pic.twitter.com/nBG8cU7525
— NewsWire (@NewsWire_US) February 24, 2026
Harris Reactivates Campaign Accounts
Harris‘s 2024 campaign accounts were reactivated this month on the social platforms X and TikTok as part of a new initiative to engage young voters in anticipation of the midterm elections. The KamalaHQ account on X posted an enigmatic video on Wednesday showcasing attempts to access the account. The user attempts to log in using the passwords “waytooonline,” “thebabysitterisweird,” and “project2025wasreal,” all of which are incorrect. The term “headquarters” is acknowledged prior to the screen turning black, at which point the word “Tomorrow” appears on the screen. Headquarters’ goal is to “mobilize pro-fairness, pro-democracy young people against far-right extremism.
The former vice president, who ran an unsuccessful bid against President Trump in 2024, will be the organization’s “chair emerita.” “I have good news,” Harris said in a YouTube short video posted late Wednesday night. “So KamalaHQ is turning into Headquarters and it’s where you can go online to get basically the latest of what’s going on, and also to meet and revisit with some of our great, courageous leaders, be they elected leaders, community leaders, civic leaders, faith leaders, young leaders.” “I’m really excited about it,” she continued.
New Progressive Content Hub Launch
The rebranded account shared the video on X with a post that read, “Welcome to Headquarters, the new Gen-Z led progressive content hub.” The banner photo features an inverted image of a bald eagle with the U.S. flag, and a light green “Headquarters” subtitled with “A News Co” written on top. Harris is seen by many as a top prospective candidate for the 2028 Democratic presidential primary election. Last year, she traveled nationwide to promote her memoir “107 Days,” which centers on her short-lived White House campaign, and encountered inquiries regarding a potential re-election bid.
