Bret Baier Stops Live Show and Breaks Massive Trump News
Bret Baier Provides Huge Update After Phone Call from Trump
Fox News anchor Bret Baier said that President Donald Trump told him that America’s military actions against Iran have essentially hit their “four-point checklist for Operation Epic Fury’s success,” adding that it has been “check, check, check, check.”
“I just got off the phone with the president. He is very pleased with you how things are going. Disheartened about the loss of life and there may be more. He said along the way. As far as the progress, he said they are ahead of where they thought they would be,” Baier began.
“I want to read some quotes that I asked him and how he answered. He said that as far as a plan, they do have a plan. Always had a plan. The intelligence, the level of intelligence that they have had up to this point is truly amazing. I asked what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up. Quote, yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out,” Baier added.
“That was going to take four to six weeks to get rid of the Iranian leadership, and it is always, you know, if they hide it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening and where. 49 leaders. You know, they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of even they don’t know,” he continued.
Baier then kicked it over to senior White House correspondent Peter Doocy to provide more details.
“The checklist for success in Epic Fury had four points on it, and according to officials here, so far it has been check, check, check, check. So, Epic Fury can end soon, that is what we are going to hear from President Trump in less than three hours,” Doocy said.
“13,000 combat flights have struck 12,300 targets and destroyed 155 Iranian vessels. Iran is a danger and I think we have attacked and destroyed their industrial complex and their weapons. I thank the administration for doing that, but I think we need to go ahead and wind down very soon,” Doocy said.
“In two to three weeks it will wind down, according to White House officials, who tell us tonight’s remarks will highlight how the Pentagon has met these goals: destroy Iran’s deadly ballistic missiles and production facilities, annihilate their navy, ensure their terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region, and guarantee that Iran can no longer obtain a nuclear weapon. Iran’s president complained today: ‘Portraying Iran as a threat is neither consistent with historical reality nor with present-day observable facts.’ But the White House says Iranian leaders keep lying,” Doocy continued.
WATCH:
“Pressure on Europe from the West Wing is building. According to the Financial Times, Donald Trump threatened to stop supplying weapons for Ukraine in order to pressure European allies to join a coalition of the willing to reopen the Strait of Hormuz,” Doocy continued.
“And Reuters reports that tonight President Trump will express his disgust with NATO for what he considers the alliance’s lack of support for U.S. objectives in Iran. President Trump says he is strongly considering withdrawing from the alliance, and he can do that with two-thirds Senate support or an act of Congress. So far, key NATO allies unmoved,” Doocy added.
“The special relationship not so special during this military campaign. Still, we don’t expect to hear President Trump say that alliances are weaknesses, it’s gonna be more like alliances are irrelevant and Epic Fury is proof. Now, NATO says they are going to send their secretary general here to Washington next week for what they insist is a long-planned visit,” he added.
This article may contain commentary which reflects the author's opinion.
Clarence Thomas Blasts Supreme Court For Refusing Florida Case
Florida argued the two states were undermining public safety by allowing individuals without legal immigration status — and, in some cases, insufficient English-language proficiency — to obtain commercial trucking licenses despite federal standards intended to govern interstate transportation safety.
The dispute gained national attention after a deadly 2025 crash on the Florida Turnpike involving an undocumented truck driver reportedly licensed through California or Washington.
According to the lawsuit, the driver allegedly made an illegal U-turn and was unable to properly interpret roadway signage, resulting in a collision that killed three people.
Joined by Justice Samuel Alito, Thomas argued the high court had a constitutional obligation to hear the interstate dispute because Florida had no other legal forum available to challenge another state’s policies.
The court’s majority denied Florida’s request without explanation.
The case underscores the growing national clash over immigration enforcement, state licensing authority, and whether states with looser immigration policies are creating broader public safety consequences for the rest of the country.
Thomas ripped the majority for refusing to hear the lawsuit since disputes between states can only be brought before the Supreme Court.
“If this Court does not exercise jurisdiction over a controversy between two States, then the complaining State has no judicial forum in which to seek relief,” Thomas wrote.
Thomas argued that Florida’s allegations against California and Washington raised serious public safety concerns, warning that failures to properly follow federal commercial driver licensing (CDL) laws can create dangerous conditions on American roadways.
Thomas pointed to the fatal Florida highway crash involving truck driver Harjinder Singh, who he said “could not read the road signs,” and argued Florida deserved a chance to pursue its claims.
Two blue states – California and Washington – issued Singh a CDL.
“An illegal alien who cannot read English road signs cannot drive an 80,000-pound tractor-trailer,” Thomas wrote.
“Federal law and regulations prohibit States from providing commercial driver’s licenses to applicants unless they pass a driver’s test, sufficiently understand the English language, and show appropriate immigration status,” he added.
Thomas argued that while the Supreme Court of the United States may have broad discretion when deciding whether to hear ordinary appeals, disputes between states occupy a different category because the Constitution grants the high court exclusive jurisdiction over those cases.
“We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given,” Thomas wrote.
He also accused the court of failing to follow the Constitution by refusing to hear disputes between states.
“This Court has adopted a discretionary approach to its exclusive original jurisdiction based on policy judgments that are in conflict with the policy choices that Congress made in the statutory text,” Thomas wrote.
Thomas argued that if Florida, California, and Washington were separate sovereign nations rather than American states, a dispute involving one government allegedly allowing unsafe drivers into another jurisdiction could trigger major diplomatic conflict.
Thomas suggested that in an international context, such disputes would likely be addressed through international courts, treaties, or direct government action.
“By entering the Union, States agree to instead have such disputes resolved by this Court,” he wrote.
The issuance of commercial driver’s licenses to non-citizens came under increased scrutiny from the Department of Transportation last summer following a series of deadly crashes involving undocumented immigrant truck drivers.
Last September, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced stricter federal requirements for non-citizens seeking commercial driver’s licenses, part of a broader push by the Trump administration to tighten transportation and immigration enforcement standards, Fox News reported.
Duffy also warned that California could risk losing federal transportation funding if the state continued allowing commercial licenses to remain active for individuals deemed ineligible under revised federal guidelines.
Kamala Harris Hints At 2028 Presidential Run
Former Vice President Kamala Harris left open the possibility Monday of another White House bid when asked whether she plans to run again. Harris, 61, announced last July that she would not seek the governorship of California, a decision that left open the possibility of a 2028 presidential campaign. Before that announcement, Harris was widely seen as weighing three options: a 2026 run for California governor, another presidential bid in 2028, or stepping away from elected office after her 2024 loss to President Donald Trump.
“Everybody here wants to know the answer. Will you run again?” podcast host and author Sharon McMahon asked the failed 2024 Democratic nominee. Harris and California Gov. Gavin Newsom currently lead a hypothetical Democratic primary field, according to the RealClearPolitics polling average. Harris receives 28.3 percent support in the average, while the term limited governor draws 20.7 percent backing.
McMahon said she was not surprised by Harris‘ answer, telling her that after reading her campaign memoir, “107 Days,” she believed Harris wanted another chance at the White House. “I closed the book and I’m like, oh, she wants to. She’s just thinking about it,” McMahon said. Harris pushed back on that interpretation. “No, the book is about a specific period in time,” she said. “There was no agenda beyond what we’ve discussed already, which is just sharing with people, you know, the reality of the experience, and hopefully allowing people to see something of themselves in it, in a way that you know that Girl Scout troop, when it comes time for them to read it, might see themselves in and know what they can do and that they could do it,” Harris said.
Kamala Harris on running in 2028: "I haven't decided. I might."pic.twitter.com/nBG8cU7525
— NewsWire (@NewsWire_US) February 24, 2026
Harris Reactivates Campaign Accounts
Harris‘s 2024 campaign accounts were reactivated this month on the social platforms X and TikTok as part of a new initiative to engage young voters in anticipation of the midterm elections. The KamalaHQ account on X posted an enigmatic video on Wednesday showcasing attempts to access the account. The user attempts to log in using the passwords “waytooonline,” “thebabysitterisweird,” and “project2025wasreal,” all of which are incorrect. The term “headquarters” is acknowledged prior to the screen turning black, at which point the word “Tomorrow” appears on the screen. Headquarters’ goal is to “mobilize pro-fairness, pro-democracy young people against far-right extremism.
The former vice president, who ran an unsuccessful bid against President Trump in 2024, will be the organization’s “chair emerita.” “I have good news,” Harris said in a YouTube short video posted late Wednesday night. “So KamalaHQ is turning into Headquarters and it’s where you can go online to get basically the latest of what’s going on, and also to meet and revisit with some of our great, courageous leaders, be they elected leaders, community leaders, civic leaders, faith leaders, young leaders.” “I’m really excited about it,” she continued.
New Progressive Content Hub Launch
The rebranded account shared the video on X with a post that read, “Welcome to Headquarters, the new Gen-Z led progressive content hub.” The banner photo features an inverted image of a bald eagle with the U.S. flag, and a light green “Headquarters” subtitled with “A News Co” written on top. Harris is seen by many as a top prospective candidate for the 2028 Democratic presidential primary election. Last year, she traveled nationwide to promote her memoir “107 Days,” which centers on her short-lived White House campaign, and encountered inquiries regarding a potential re-election bid.
