Handful of Democrats Join House GOP To End DHS Shutdown
The U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation Thursday to fund the Department of Homeland Security and end a weeks-long partial shutdown, with four Democrats joining Republicans in supporting the measure.
The bill cleared the House by a 221–207 vote, mostly along party lines, and would fund DHS operations through the end of the fiscal year. Most Democratic lawmakers opposed the measure, citing disagreements over immigration enforcement policies and oversight provisions.
The legislation comes amid an ongoing standoff in Congress that has left the department partially shut down for several weeks. Funding lapses have affected several DHS activities, including some training programs and grant funding, though essential personnel such as airport security officers and Coast Guard members have continued working.
The Democrats voting in favor were Reps. Henry Cuellar of Texas, Don Davis of North Carolina, Jared Golden of Maine and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington, the Washington Times reported.
“But the Senate shot down a similar measure earlier Thursday in a 51-45 procedural vote that fell short of the 60 votes needed to advance it. Only one Democrat, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, voted with Republicans,” said the outlet.
Supporters of the bill said the measure was necessary to restore full funding for border security, cybersecurity operations, and emergency preparedness programs. Opponents argued that the legislation did not sufficiently address concerns about immigration enforcement practices and oversight of federal agents.
Lawmakers from both parties have continued negotiations as the shutdown dispute remains tied to broader debates over immigration policy and the role of federal enforcement agencies.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been shut down since February 14 when its temporary funding expired. However, agencies under its umbrella, such as FEMA and the TSA, are considered essential, so their employees have been working without pay. Meanwhile, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, also under DHS, has furloughed some of its employees.
House Appropriations Chairman Tom Cole, Oklahoma Republican, said on the House floor Thursday that the funding is “critical…at such an important time for our country.”
“Shutting down the Department of Homeland Security over [a] partisan fight hasn’t changed the stakes, but maybe knowing how critical it is to keep the homeland safe at this heightened moment, Democrats will side with reason and protecting the nation,” Cole said, per the Times.
“Shutdowns are never the answer. I know my colleagues think that by shutting down the government, they are somehow punishing Donald Trump for winning the election, but President Trump is not the one feeling the pain of the shutdown,” he said.
“They are punishing the TSA agents who are working hard to keep their community safe, they’re punishing FEMA employees who are trying to help Americans fighting through these winter storms, they are punishing the cybersecurity analysts at CISA who are combating constant threats to our infrastructure and electric grid,” he added.
Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, the top Democratic appropriator, called the push for the bill to pass “political theater” and “a cynical attempt to extract more funding for lawless agencies because of a crisis that the president has created without an imminent threat.”
“If Republicans were serious this week we could have funded every agency under the Department of Homeland Security except for ICE and for CBP and I will not vote for another dime for these agencies until we get the reforms that the American people want and stopping these agencies for terrorizing these communities,” she said.
ICE detention and deportation operations under the Trump administration have been generally well-received by the American public, according to surveys.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, Louisiana Republican, said during a press gaggle on Wednesday that “everybody in America better watch” to see who votes against the funding.
“Anybody who votes to block funding for the homeland, it is shameful,” Johnson said. “I don’t know how to describe it. It speaks to a long record of Democrats’ deliberate efforts to undermine America’s safety and the essential operations of DHS.”
Obama Accuses JD Vance Of Promoting ‘Blood And Soil’ Politics
Former President Barack Obama rarely mentions Vice President JD Vance by name, but that changed this week with one of his sharpest public attacks since Vance took office.
The comments immediately fueled speculation that Democrats are beginning to focus more attention on the vice president as Republicans look ahead to the post-Trump era.
Speaking Thursday during a conversation with author Malcolm Gladwell, Obama accused Vance of promoting what he described as a “blood and soil” vision of America, despite being married to Usha Vance, the daughter of Indian immigrants.
Obama made the remarks while discussing the Reconstruction era and arguing that many of the same debates over citizenship, voting rights and national identity continue today.
“We have a politics now that at least one of our major parties has been captured by politics that is not that subtle about suggesting that ‘We the people’ means a certain kind of people,” Obama said.
“When you have the vice president, current vice president, making a speech that is basically a blood and soil version of ‘We the people,’ that it matters who your parents were and how long they’ve been here despite him being married to a daughter of an immigrant himself.”
The phrase “blood and soil” is historically associated with Nazi Germany and white nationalist ideology.
Obama went on to argue that debates over who belongs in America remain central to the nation’s politics.
“That echoes, then, ideas about who can be a citizen, who belongs, who gets to make decisions,” he said.
Gladwell followed by accusing Vance of hypocrisy, arguing that the vice president was making what he called a nativist argument despite his own family’s immigrant background.
Obama agreed.
“That is progress,” Obama said.
“Listen, hypocrisy is progress. It is, because it means that you feel guilty enough to either lie to yourself or others.”
Fox News Digital reported that it reached out to Vance’s office for comment.
Obama did not identify the specific speech he was criticizing, but Vance’s most recent nationally televised remarks came during Independence Day celebrations marking America’s 250th birthday.
In that speech, Vance encouraged Americans to reject what he called a “two-dimensional view” of the country focused only on its historical failures.
“So what I’d ask you to do, my fellow Americans, on our 250th birthday, is to reject the two-dimensional view of your fellow citizens and reject the two-dimensional view of your country,” Vance said.
“Reject the view of your nation that sees only its sins, but not its grace and its greatness.”
He also emphasized that America’s accomplishments were achieved by “a common people working towards a common future.”
Obama has generally avoided making Vance a regular target since the vice president took office.
One notable exception came during the 2024 presidential campaign when then-Vice President Kamala Harris selected Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate.
Without naming Vance directly, Obama contrasted Harris’ choice with the Republican ticket.
“When a presidential candidate chooses a running mate, it says a lot about who they are and what kind of president they’ll be,” Obama said at the time, Fox News reported.
Political observers have increasingly discussed Vance as a potential frontrunner for the 2028 Republican presidential nomination, though he has not announced any plans to run.
Against that backdrop, Obama’s unusually direct criticism is likely to fuel speculation that some Democrats are beginning to sharpen their message against a politician they view as a likely future standard-bearer for the Republican Party. While no Democratic leaders have publicly described their strategy in those terms, prominent figures often begin drawing contrasts with potential future rivals well before a presidential campaign officially begins.
Whether that proves to be the case remains to be seen, but Obama’s remarks marked one of his most pointed critiques of Vance to date and ensured the vice president once again found himself at the center of the national political conversation.
