Trump has threatened ‘taking Cuba.’ What’s at stake for the US economically, politically?
Since the U.S. government captured Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in January, the U.S. has blocked oil shipments from Venezuela to Cuba. Venezuela was previously Cuba’s main petroleum supplier, and President Donald Trump has threatened other countries with tariffs if they sell fuel to Cuba.
The U.S. and Cuba have been at odds — economically and sometimes militarily — since the Cuban revolution led by Fidel Castro in 1959. But the current crisis is among the most difficult Cuba has faced since then.
The blockade has pushed Cuba’s economy to collapse. The island has spiraled into a worsening humanitarian crisis, with electrical grid failure, hospitals canceling surgeries, and schools and businesses closing.
Trump has warned for months about the possibility of "taking Cuba."
"Whether I free it, take it, I think, I could do anything I want with it," Trump told reporters March 16.
Cuba’s deputy foreign minister, Carlos Fernández de Cossío, responded that the country is preparing for "the possibility of military aggression."
Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel, meanwhile, said his government has started talking with the Trump administration. He said the talks are aimed at finding ways to resolve the countries’ bilateral problems. Díaz-Canel floated allowing Cubans living abroad to invest in Cuba’s economy. His government also said it was planning to release 51 political prisoners.
But the Cuban regime seems unwilling to give up its decades-long monopoly on power, even as the Trump administration tries to push the president out, according to The New York Times.
"The nature of the Cuban government, the structure of the Cuban government and the members of the Cuban government are not part of the negotiation," Fernández de Cossío said on NBC’s "Meet the Press." "That is something that no sovereign country negotiates."
With the possibility of U.S. military action against Cuba looming — along with the potential for Cuba’s government and economy to collapse — we considered key questions about the island and its relationship to the U.S.
How did Cuba get here?
The current energy squeeze was triggered by a U.S. oil blockade, but over the long term, significant blame for Cuba’s dire economy falls on the Cuban government itself, experts said.
"At its core lies a rigid, socialist, centralized economic model marked by extensive nationalization, a bloated public sector, and deep resistance to reform," said Cristina Lopez-Gottardi Chao, an assistant professor and Cuba scholar at the University of Virginia. "The leadership’s reluctance to liberalize likely stems from concerns that meaningful market reforms could create independent centers of power and erode the regime’s control over society."
The Cuban government and military have long influenced or controlled major economic sectors, and one of the most important — tourism — failed to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, she said. The situation worsened in recent months with the U.S. military action against Venezuela.
Would the U.S. gain economically from a significant change in Cuba’s government?
Experts widely agree the U.S. likely would see only modest economic benefits from Cuba’s government changing.
"Cuba is a small market for U.S. products and exports almost nothing," said Sebastian A. Arcos, interim director of Florida International University’s Cuban Research Institute.
While a new government could mean U.S. companies could invest in Cuba for the first time in decades, "Cuba has little in the way of natural resources," said Will Freeman, a Latin America Studies fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations think tank. "There is potential in the tourism sector, but only if infrastructure and the energy grid are revamped, which is a big undertaking with no clear financing source."
People make their way through Havana, Cuba, on March 25. (AP)
Would a change in Cuba’s government impact geopolitics?
Cuba "has been a determined enemy of the U.S., one that has welcomed and collaborated with strategic enemies of the U.S.," Arcos said. It has also sheltered U.S. criminals and spied on the U.S.
A friendlier government in Havana would help secure vital shipping lanes that carry a large amount of U.S. trade, said Jorge Duany, former director of the Cuban Research Institute.
Preventing a humanitarian crisis in Cuba — and promoting democracy and human rights — also advances U.S. geopolitical interests, said Theodore Henken, a Baruch College sociologist and anthropologist who has studied Cuba.
Regime change could lead to the resolution of decades-old claims of property seized from Cubans who fled the communist takeover, a dispute valued in the billions of dollars.
However, some experts argue that potential U.S. gains are overstated. Aside from boosting the Trump administration’s embrace of right-leaning leaders in Central America and stripping China of listening stations it’s believed to have on the island, "The fact is that today, Cuba is relatively unimportant geopolitically," Henken said.
What are the risks to the U.S. of continuing to increase pressure on Cuba?
Continued U.S. economic pressure likely would lead to more deaths, hunger and failing hospitals. "No modern economy can function without fuel," Arcos said.
For the U.S., the biggest direct impact from an intensifying humanitarian crisis would be instability or state collapse leading to mass emigration. That would run counter to the Trump administration’s high-priority effort to curb illegal immigration, and would most directly burden Florida, Trump’s home state.
The sudden fall of the Cuban government might "create a chaotic power vacuum, which could provoke a prolonged, bloody, and expensive U.S. intervention," Duany said.
In Truth Social Post Trump Says U.S. ‘Near Endgame’ in Iran, U.S. Nears Key Military Goals
Trump Declares U.S. Near ‘Endgame’ in Iran on Truth Social – Victory Almost Here?
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump has sent a powerful message to the world: the United States is nearing the “endgame” in its decisive operation against Iran.
In a blockbuster Truth Social post, Trump announced that American forces are closing in on all key military objectives in Operation Epic Fury. The operation, now in its third week, has already crippled Iran’s missile production, destroyed naval assets, and eliminated major threats to American allies and shipping lanes.
“We are very close to the endgame in Iran,” Trump wrote. “Our military has performed brilliantly. The job is almost done.”
The post comes as the Pentagon continues releasing dramatic footage of precision strikes using advanced laser systems and airstrikes. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed that U.S. forces have hit every major target on the original list, with only final cleanup operations remaining.
Decisive Action, Not Endless War
Hegseth has repeatedly emphasized that this mission is the opposite of the failed nation-building wars of the past. “This is not Iraq. This is not endless,” he said. “We destroy the missiles, destroy the production sites, destroy the navy, and we prevent nuclear weapons. Then we come home.”
Four American service members have been killed in the operation, but the results have been overwhelming. Iranian missile capabilities have been severely degraded, and Tehran’s nuclear ambitions are in serious jeopardy.
Key Military Goals Almost Complete
According to senior defense officials, the United States has achieved or is very close to achieving every objective:
Destruction of Iran’s primary missile manufacturing facilities
Elimination of key naval threats in the region
Significant reduction in Iran’s ability to threaten international shipping
Prevention of nuclear breakout capability
Trump’s Truth Social announcement signals that the end of active combat operations may be near. The president has made it clear there will be no boots on the ground and no long-term occupation — exactly what America First voters demanded.
America First Foreign Policy Delivering Results
This is exactly what President Trump promised during the campaign: strong, decisive military action with clear goals and quick victories. No more trillion-dollar forever wars. No more nation-building. Just overwhelming American strength used smartly to protect U.S. interests and allies.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio praised the operation, saying the old world order is gone and a new era of American strength has begun. Prime Minister Netanyahu has coordinated closely with Trump throughout the mission.
Democrats Stay Silent or Criticize
While Republicans celebrate the progress, many Democrats have remained strangely quiet or even criticized the operation. Their refusal to support strong action against Iran only proves they learned nothing from the failures of the past administration.
The American people see the difference clearly. Under Trump, America acts with strength and purpose. Under previous leadership, Iran was allowed to advance its nuclear program unchecked.
What Happens Next?
With the endgame approaching, the focus now shifts to ensuring Iran never rebuilds its missile and nuclear programs. Trump has made it clear that any future aggression will be met with even stronger force.
The president’s Truth Social post is both a victory message and a warning: America is winning, and the mission is almost complete.
May you like
This is America First in action — protecting our nation, supporting our allies, and delivering real results without wasting American lives or treasure on endless conflicts.
The endgame is near. Iran’s threats are being neutralized. And President Trump is once again proving why the American people chose strength over weakness.
